Blog 1 페이지 | CubeEye_The sensible way of Depth measuring

Blog

Blog

2

Applications of ToF Cameras ..

You can log after login. Do you want to move to the member subscription page?

Do you want to scrap this post?

Applications of ToF Cameras _Aging Society and Abnormal Behavior Detection: Practical Effectiveness and Strategic Implications of ToF Sensing In the 21st century, advances in medical technology and improvements in living standards have steadily increased average life expectancy. While the extension of human longevity represents a remarkable achievement, it also poses significant challenges to contemporary societies. Among these, one of the most urgent is the assurance of safety within an aging population. 1. New Safety Challenges Brought by an Aging Society According to the World Health Organization (WHO), by 2050 approximately 22% of the global population will be aged 60 years or older. South Korea, however, is undergoing this demographic transition at an even more accelerated pace. Projections by Statistics Korea indicate that by 2025 more than 20% of its population will be aged 65 or above, thereby entering what is formally designated a “super-aged” society. This development extends beyond a demographic statistic; it necessitates comprehensive transformation in welfare policy, healthcare systems, and the broader social safety framework. Among the threats to quality of life in later years, falls constitute a particularly critical hazard. A survey conducted by the Ministry of Health and Welfare reveals that over 30% of seniors aged 65 and older experience at least one fall annually. Such incidents frequently result in fractures, prolonged medical treatment, and rising healthcare expenditures. The ramifications extend beyond individual misfortune, imposing emotional and financial strain upon families and exerting mounting pressure on public welfare budgets. Simultaneously, traditional family-based caregiving structures are weakening, while dual-income households are increasingly prevalent. Consequently, society is being compelled to supplement elder care through institutional arrangements and technological innovation. Policy reform, the introduction of smart care services, and the integration of smart city initiatives must be understood within this context. From a sociological perspective, abnormal behavior detection technologies are not merely functional safety devices. Rather, they are mechanisms that preserve the autonomy and dignity of older adults, mitigate social costs, and reinforce social cohesion. Seniors who experience reduced anxiety regarding the risk of falling are more inclined to participate in community activities and leisure pursuits, thereby enhancing social vitality. In this respect, fall-prevention and behavior-detection systems are emerging as indispensable components of the modern social safety infrastructure. 2. Technical Comparison of Sensing Methods The core question of abnormal behavior detection technologies is: “How accurately and reliably can changes in human movement and condition be captured?” Today’s market offers several representative approaches: camera-based vision, radar (RF) sensing, thermal imaging, and ToF (Time-of-Flight) depth sensing. Camera-based vision uses RGB or IR cameras to capture video, applying AI algorithms to detect anomalies. While it provides high-resolution and precise behavioral analysis, it faces major privacy concerns and is highly sensitive to lighting and field-of-view limitations. Radar-based RF sensing analyzes reflected electromagnetic signals to detect motion. It is independent of lighting conditions and can even detect through walls. However, it struggles to differentiate fine movements, making it useful for detecting simple falls but less effective in recognizing complex abnormal behaviors. Thermal imaging detects infrared radiation emitted by the human body, functioning even in complete darkness. Its low resolution, however, limits detailed behavior recognition, and accuracy decreases when body and background temperatures are similar. The cost of equipment is also relatively high. ToF sensing emits infrared signals and measures the time they take to return after reflecting off objects, producing pixel-level depth data. This enables the creation of 3D depth maps to precisely analyze a person’s position, posture, and movement speed. Most importantly, ToF utilizes non-identifiable data, minimizing privacy concerns while providing accurate behavior recognition—setting it apart from other methods. 3. Practical Effectiveness of ToF Sensing ToF sensing is particularly well-suited for abnormal behavior detection for three main reasons: Balance between privacy and precision Cameras provide precision but compromise privacy. Radar preserves privacy but lacks detail. ToF achieves both: using anonymized depth data to distinguish behaviors such as falling, staggering, or prolonged immobility. Environmental adaptability Unlike cameras, ToF is not affected by lighting changes. It directly measures spatial depth, ensuring reliable operation in confined or low-visibility environments such as bathrooms, hospital rooms, and nursing facilities. Scalability and versatility ToF sensors can be modularized for deployment in various facilities. Beyond safety, they can support space management by analyzing dwell times and facility usage patterns, linking abnormal behavior detection to broader smart building and smart city operations. 4. Limitations and Challenges of ToF Sensing Of course, ToF is not without limitations. In multi-person environments, it may struggle with precise object separation. Reflective surfaces such as mirrors or glass can introduce noise. Current datasets for abnormal behavior detection are limited, requiring ongoing expansion. Additionally, cost and power consumption must be addressed for large-scale commercialization. Nevertheless, these challenges are not insurmountable. By combining ToF with AI—leveraging larger datasets, transfer learning, and continual training—performance can steadily improve. Advances in low-power design and network optimization also promise to mitigate these constraints. 5. Conclusion: Technology that Secures Both Safety and Dignity In the context of an aging society, abnormal behavior detection and fall-prevention technologies can no longer be regarded as optional measures; they have become essential. The critical challenge, however, lies in ensuring safety without compromising individual privacy and dignity. At present, Time-of-Flight (ToF) sensing represents one of the most promising solutions capable of achieving this delicate balance. More than a technical innovation, ToF technology contributes to a broader social value: it enables the coexistence of protection and human dignity. Looking forward, it is well positioned to establish itself as a new standard of safety infrastructure—not only within elderly care and healthcare facilities, but also across public institutions and industrial environments. For the information technology sector, the true opportunity extends beyond the advancement of detection mechanisms. Its significance lies in shaping the foundation of a smarter and safer society, where technological progress serves both social well-being and human dignity. Time of flight depht camera Lidar comparison
1

ToF vs. LiDAR: Technical Com..

You can log after login. Do you want to move to the member subscription page?

Do you want to scrap this post?

Time of flight depht camera Lidar comparison ToF vs. LiDAR: Technical Comparison of 3D Depth Cameras 1. Definition and Types of 3D Depth Sensing Technology 3D depth sensing refers to all technologies that measure the distance to an object and use that information to perceive the surrounding environment in three dimensions.The key goal of this technology is to measure distances as accurately as, or even better than, the human eye and to transform the real world into 3D data.Beyond flat, two-dimensional images, obtaining depth (the Z-axis) information is crucial. Category iToF (Indirect Time-of-Flight) LiDAR (Direct Time-of-Flight) Measurement Principle Distance calculated from the phase shift of reflected light Distance measured directly by the time delay of returning light Light Source LED or VCSEL (940 nm) High-power laser (905 nm, 1550 nm) Detection Method Image sensor Single/multi-channel detector (APD, SPAD) Measurement Range Short to medium range (typically 0.1–10 m) Medium to long range (up to several hundred meters) Accuracy Millimeter–centimeter level Higher noise observed at depth map edges Frame Rate High (supports real-time 3D depth acquisition) Relatively lower (depends on scanning speed) Data Format Depth map (2D + distance) Point cloud Implementation Form Compact, camera-type module Mechanical scanner or solid-state configuration Cost Relatively low High (particularly for long-range systems) Depth sensing technologies can be broadly categorized into four main types, each applied to different fields depending on the detection range, as summarized in the table below. Among these, Time-of-Flight (ToF) measures the time it takes for light to travel to an object and back. Within ToF, there are two subcategories: i-ToF (Indirect Time-of-Flight) and d-ToF (Direct Time-of-Flight, commonly referred to as LiDAR). 2. Principle of i-ToF (Indirect Time-of-Flight) i-ToF, or Indirect Time-of-Flight, measures distance not by sending a single pulse directly but by calculating the phase shift between emitted and reflected light waves. In simple terms, it determines how much the waveform of the returned light is shifted compared to the emitted light.An analogy is comparing two identical clocks: one marks the emission time, and the other marks the return time. The difference between the hands of the two clocks corresponds to the distance.As illustrated in the diagram, an i-ToF system calculates the phase difference between the outgoing and incoming pulse trains. Thanks to advances in cost-effective CMOS imaging technology, integrated circuits can now provide distance information per pixel directly on the imaging chip. This allows the system to capture distance data for an entire frame simultaneously, generating real-time 3D maps. 3. Principle of d-ToF (LiDAR)d-ToF, commonly known as LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), measures distance by directly timing the travel of a laser pulse. Unlike i-ToF, which infers distance from phase shifts, LiDAR can be compared to using a stopwatch to measure the exact travel time of the light pulse. High-power laser pulses are emitted, and the system measures the delay of the reflected signals to calculate distance and construct a 3D point cloud map. Because d-ToF can perform fast and multiple echo measurements, it can detect several objects simultaneously within the sensor’s field of view. 4. Operating MechanismsToF sensors can be categorized into mechanical and solid-state (fixed) types depending on their components and scanning method.Mechanical LiDAR uses rotating or oscillating optics to scan a focused beam, enabling long-range detection. However, the inclusion of moving parts such as motors makes it less durable.i-ToF systems are typically solid-state (fixed) and capture the entire scene at once.d-ToF (LiDAR) systems often use detectors such as APD (Avalanche Photodiode) or SPAD (Single-Photon Avalanche Diode) and can be implemented with five different scanning approaches. 5. Comparison: i-ToF vs. LiDAR i-ToF:Advantages: Simple architecture, compact form factor, real-time 3D imaging, and low implementation cost.Limitations: Limited to short-range measurements and susceptible to errors in multi-path interference (e.g., reflective environments).d-ToF (LiDAR):Advantages: Long-range measurement, high precision, and the ability to detect multiple objects in outdoor environments.Limitations: Complex architecture, higher cost, and large data throughput requiring additional post-processing hardware.Rather than being competing technologies, i-ToF and LiDAR serve different specialized applications. The choice depends on the use case, and hybrid systems combining i-ToF and LiDAR are also being researched to leverage the strengths of both. i-ToF (IndirectTime-of-Flight) LiDAR (Direct ToF) Measurement Principle Calculates distancefrom the phase shift of reflected light Directly measuresthe time delay of the reflected light Light Source LED or VCSEL (940 nm) High-power laser (905nm, 1550 nm) Detection Method Image sensor Single/multipledetectors (APD, SPAD) Measurement Range Several meters to tensof meters (typically 0.1–10 m) Tens to hundreds ofmeters Accuracy Millimeter tocentimeter level Increased edge noise indepth maps Frame Rate High (enables real-time3D depth) Relatively low (dependson scanning speed) Data Format Depth map (2D +distance) Point cloud ImplementationStructure Camera-type compactmodule Mechanical scanner orsolid-state design Cost Relatively low High (especially forlong-range models) 6. Application Domains: i-ToF vs. LiDAR — Which Should You Choose?For short-range, real-time, compact sensing → i-ToFi-ToF excels in close-range, high-speed 3D sensing. Since it captures the entire scene in a single frame, it can generate real-time 3D depth maps. Typical applications include robot arm position control, AR/VR, driver monitoring systems (DMS), occupant monitoring systems (OMS), and facial recognition (FRU).

Blog

Search